Бля, вроде взрослый мужик
Во первых-не пости с русских ресурсов.Там ноль источников и пишут некомпетентные люди
Во вторых -
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/n ... to-be.html
http://investorplace.com/2013/07/answer ... -year-old/
Цитаты-"
The phone and charger were purchased at an Apple Store"
"
Ma's sister insisted the iPhone had been purchased from an official Apple store at the end of last year"
Мы имеем заявления-
а)сестры
б)эппл
в)полиции
г)сам зарядник в качестве улики
и самое важное
д) такие случаи происходили лишь в азитском регионе и связаны ни с эппл,ни с палеными зарядниками(миллионы,по официальным данным, пользуются ими вордвайд,почему убивает лишь в китае?

)
Дело в особенности норм китайской безопасности в плане энергопотребления,заземлении,может быть куча факторов которые нельзя проверить не изучив блупринт проводки дома,норм безопасности,особенностей заземления,количества приборов в доме и так далее

5 вольт не убиваю людей
Вот мнение эксперта,он намного компетентнее меня в этом вопросе. Если знаешь английский и тебе действительно интересно.
Очень подробно описана тех сторона.
СПОЙЛЕР
Firstly, up to now, Without any proof showed out the death of the 23-year-old Chinese woman was using a fake charger or a third-party charger.
In TV reported shown that is a HK version charger of the Apple iPhone, but it had a changeover plug. The plug seat is a difference in between HK and China, but it is absolutely not a pretext at a charger could lead to the electrocuted death.
All of the iPhone charger fit working in 100 - 240V AC power, its design is purposes for Global Travel. Even if the Chinese version iPhone are also the same providing multi-format changeover plugs as the purposes in global travel.
Secondly, although most of the regular charger gotten safety tested like UL, CE, HKSI, 3C, etc...,
However, Apple is ever done their iPhone 3 charger were recalled, --- it could lead to get an electric shock. IBM is ever done their notebook charger were recalled, it could happen fire and electric shock, the recall event was based some accident cases already appeared. There are also more examples.
Thirdly, in technically, most of the nowaday chargers are employing a switching power supply way. Unlike in a low-frequency transformer, a switch-transformer in between the primary coil and the secondary coil would have high electric potential difference, while the worst situation that is likely up to 1Kv even 2KV in potential difference, that is ---- 220 volt AC + 300 volt DC + Peak pulse currents (switch-transformer running).
Once it leakage not always to instantly show out the device failure, likely just the terminal device a zero potential floated upward to 220 volt AC or higher (220V AC + 300V DC + Peak pulse currents), without secondary circuit's DC voltage range amplified up, the terminal device is still running. So, a risk would follow with you this moment.
When the terminal device was metallic parts or shell in its outside, the leakage currents are easy via your body connected to ground.
И ты не имеешь ни одного основания заявлять что я "кукарекаю" ,ибо я привожу факты,а ты в типичной манере фантазируешь,
строишь адеквата и порешь глупость на уровне недалекого человека
